March 30, 2018. Revised on Jun 08, 2018.
We will not defend a vision of the world based on third world logic of West and East, but only in logic of our British approach of doing business as we always do. We treat business with countries through our colonization that do not share our values, we do not oblige them to adopt our values, we just created the way to have them being reliable, good and winning winning economic partners, hardly did we just impose the basic values for being them to be our business partners as with school. That was the smart differential procedure we use to have the best through our colonization.
The classical logic consists of seeing the world as every country which is sliding dictatorship is leaving our Western world for the Eastern one. But, there is no such logic as Russia and China are all full members of the world economic organization, and integrate smartly our system to use it against us.
We have already contained and defeated them at their game by using that good strategy though bad to some parts of the axis as us, and now they are using this same strategy to bouncing back well, if they do not already bounce back for good, because it is a matter of pragmatic and interests perspective than seeing them as world leaders and facing them as them as so: any other way to contain and defeat them, or defending our interests in their own newly gained power, as on the principle of : We have only interests to defend; it is only when a country is on our interests way that it becomes our enemies. Now, they treat not only in countries we are mainly, but even where we do not treat business or do it less as the leaders do not share our values, as in Brazil, Venezuela, Zimbabwe etc. Of course, through our economic activities we will never abandon defending our basic and fundamental values of human rights and democracy. How will you say? For example imagine selling our Western liberal and human rights encouraging products as computers, iphones, novels, TV, Radio, cars, shoes that advertise individualistic empowerment values. For example selling cheap and even quality football, rugby and basketball shoes and tools for doing this sport in a country, will give us the same result than defeating military country as North Korea. Because it is quite clear if the people have easy access through the price and the availability of the product to those products they will practice football, rugby, and basketball and even fight to follow the biggest championship that will lead to a dynamism of change that will make the communist and oppressive regime that is leading the country, will be contained and toppled. Then, you see pragmatically we do business with a pariah country, win the economic advantages and with time winning the values interests. As comparison, it is through force that we almost impose through our capitalism, and industrialization in our colonies and territories, but we impose it to the remaining part of the world through economic exchange.
Then we, King George VII will restore our geopolitical and economic leadership through the use of our English and British perspective: our values we keep and use them for ourselves, with the other others we have a transcended common values of winning winning. Of course such perspective needs a strong army with which wherever we do business even in hostile country and environment, we have the mean to defend our businesses and interests. That was the logic of factories, and that is the pragmatic logic that is behind the birth, the development of capitalism and industrialization as based on the defense of one’s values and interests for ourselves.
In all the important geopolitical regions of the world, we will erect and develop one of our oversee territories, or former colony as dynamic creator in those regions. They would our platform to create a dynamic profitable development to us and will sell our country image for reaching more market.
After all, when we look quite well wherever, in our former Colonial Empire there is a backward movement of those countries being helped to be neutral and then controlled by helping them deconstructing everything we build under the anthem of the basic principles as good for doing business as our English language, such is how in many of our former colonial empire there is a backward movement to their local languages as the case of Nigeria, or Kenya, Uganda restoring gradually their local languages as official languages. Then, there is an urgent need to use the same containment and defeating strategy with lot of ground presence because we may call it as we want the principle of military bases is that, we are almost the only one super powerful country to abandon it when the others are more than even engaging in extending their military bases numbers. Where are the Russians in Syria, will they leave like this Syria, even when the war will be over? It is mere naivety than thinking so. The Chinese are already more than ever engaged in an enterprise of building military bases or infrastructures that is the first step to it on all the different islands and countries they control the government or have influence as in South Asia that they went to set as the basis of their geopolitical planetary leadership. The Russians are doing the same with Ukraine and the countries they control in their sphere of influence. In such context we should strengthen our bases, and we have endless ways to do so directly for example the liberalization of security in the other countries, with the private companies among many.
Whenever, a world war breaks we will have a serious handicap for not having the source of energy in our country, we have to import it from other countries of the world at thousand miles from here, when in major conflict the time of supply is fundamental. Beside, even the fact that to secure the supply of oil all the thousands miles from the country producers to our country needs the mobilization of lot of soldiers that can be used on other more useful battlefield. For all practical purposes, oil is against our geo political interests. Here is why clearly before even inventing a perfect substitute of it, King George VII, will favor green energy and even electric cars, beside the oil that we will gradually reduce its use before banning it.
There is enough room of improvement to be done in war medicine (the medicine that treated wounded and sick soldiers on the front). The old saw never goes wrong the best way to avoid a war is to prepare to fight it. We launch research to make war medicine highly developed to give quick support to our soldiers so that to save as much as possible and keeping Constance our soldiers’ number, things that is important in winning a war. The first effort will be put in developing robots, and apparel to enter in a burning car, or place due for example an explosion for taking and treated the wounded soldiers. There is as well fund research in treating and healing quickly injuries so that to reduce at its greatest extant the time of indisponibility of our soldiers.
March 30, 018.
The major point of research to carry one, and then having the monopoly of the invention is finding techniques to fight war with a nuclear country, being using even their full nuclear capacity. That is an avoidable problem that armies of the world will face. Imagine two nuclear countries are doing war including the use of their nuclear weapon. In such scenario how to reduce as much as possible the death toll due to the power of the explosion and the radioactivity? The urgent research to carry one is finding a remedy against radioactivity, will compulsory existed as nature created nothing without making available in the word equation its remedies. The second research to carry one is how to neutralize the radioactivity in the air in case of nuclear explosion? Does the solution of this problem involve a given form of plant that inhale quickly radioactivity, especially water, and radioactive air. Or does this solution need the invention of machine that isolate radioactive element in the air, and then inhale them? Or does it goes with inventing substance that spread in the nature absorb or transform radioactive element in the air in the same way water and gas kills fire? Does it involve creating a heavy gravitalioned engine that reduce the gravity number so that when the engine is activate the gravity will be low, then the engine will not explode, or explode at smallest rate possible. Or what is the next most powerful weapon that will be more powerful than the nuclear with whom we can defeated an enemy before its use its full nuclear weapon capacity. All those points will lead to the invention of products and techniques that will be highly marketable among nations, a form of very lucrative business that involves billions of dollar. There is as well our military advance on other countries in the world, everything that is very important in case of war with another nation, or world war. Those are basic invention as dealing with the security, the sovereignty, and the further of the power of a country, here are the first point of concern of every nation of the world, developing a mean to secure and defend the country against foreign aggressors. Economy is the first concern of a country only in period of peace, but even there an economy cannot progress without persuasive and effective tools and means of defending and protecting the people and their goods.
The answer to the problem causes by iron based weapons as knife, gun, bomb, and nuclear bomb is in the development of defense system against by using magnet. Magnet technology when refine can prevent a gun to reach its target by diverting its trajectory, it can even prevent it to be triggered. When it comes to bombs it can prevent to explode or reducing the level of the explosion that is the same with nuclear bomb, as well it can hamper them exploding. Knowing the greatest potential in equipping against enemies iron based weapons, King George VII will create a especial center of research dedicated to find the ways to use magnets to cancel the deadly effect of the enemies iron weapons of all sort.
