Prince Philip and his vision of Consortship

May 17, 2018. Nov 13, 2018.

   The below footage is an interview of Prince Philip in 1983, the first year of my imprisonment. His oldness then, appears quite well in this interview of then. The wrinkles around his eyes that he did have then as you see appear quite well. Still he was not as old as advanced old. He is just quite much old than when he was in 1960s.

   

   

       This video of Thames TV did not fall in any trap or attempt to book the interview as belonging to any period. Beside the one that appears based on the knowledge of the interview; couple to the people ability to identified successfully the date of the interview. Of course it all appears that it is my father, Prince Philip in 1983. 

      

                                                                                    Prince Philip interviewed by Thames TV

                                                           Prince Philip and my mother, pregnant of me here in Balmoral in 1981.

   He has been very saddened by the fact they have chosen to jail me. Still, he cries with hot tears during the final stage of the transportation to Niger. More Elizabeth II supports the emotional charge of her choice, more he tends not to understand or accept it. And do not forget he was a Captain of the British Army, emotional charge he knows a great deal more than even Elizabeth II. We let you his tears to judge by yourself.


                                          Prince Philip and my mother. Here he is crying during the heartbreaking period of my transportation to Niger.

     I did quite well remember how sad not only he was but my mother as well. That year is certainly the saddest of our lives. Terrible thing happens not only for our Kingdom, a son is taken by cruelty from the affectious eyes of his parents. Still those souvenir though past of 35 are strong in me as it is yesterday. How can the souvenir of being taken from ones love and hearts disappear just like this. I live with them, and they define me as a person, a prince who want only be free to see his mother. Indeed, my father, Prince Philip was dead. It was in 2007 (This information we have it from credible sources, and you can verify it as well.But for not giving you the impression of our respectable site and movement being in kind of logic of theory of conspiracy when our movement is noble and sacred; we let you the choice not to believe that news, we are fine with that). That means I could never see him, I could never lie eyes on his charming, calm and playful face who hates silence and shyness. Nonetheless, he was far of being noisy or talkative but just cool. He adores playing with his son. 

    I have lost my grandfather as well on May 12, 1998. It was like yesterday as well, something dies with me along with him. I remember as I could figure out him dying that year I had a serious nostalgia and long sadness that never left. That sadness sank me in 2002 in a deep depression.

  In this interview, he was given his feeling and conception of being the husband of the Queen. He says for him that is not a function, modest he was. Indeed, he was the third political and symbolic personality of our Kingdom being the husband of the Queen. He was not called King, how could he when the Queen is the supreme monarch, God Deputy on earth? The sweetest title which fits the context is Prince. Indeed, he was as powerful as a Queen was to his King. He did well his job, by not attempting overshadowing the Queen. Though he did lot do of public engagements just as a Queen would have done to her King.  

   In this video he talks about his conception of democracy in relation of our Kingdom. He talks about the place of the individual in democratic society not mentioning that in our Kingdom there is no individuals but Subjects sacred piece of God, with dignity, values and honour all the different classical values that made our kingdom the most stable geopolitical entity in the world. 

  In relation of the individual he got it right when in the same paragraph of speech, he talks about dictatorship, though not associating the two. Indeed, he mentioned the individual in other countries meaning that he did not see our Subjects as individuals. He talks about dictatorship in democratic context in the other countries. Either in democratic or non-democratic concept dictatorship is only possible out of divine monarchic political system. Because in divine monarchy, commonly mentioned as Constitutional Monarchy, the Supreme Leader is not the Monarch but God that he represented on earth. He rules according to His commands, not according to man’s or to his own thinking. It is not as in dictatorship context when the individual in his attempt to feel himself as a person vested with values and dignity fighting to have power and wealth that he thinks giving him power; giving him life; making him different of the others at least for his power. That is the concept of VIP, Very Important Personality. The desire of being especial is always here, but cannot only prosper in no saint monarchic system.

    The monarch cannot grow dictator as he served God by being his representative to men. Then how can he be a dictator, when having a sacred role limited by sacred laws, charts and traditions. Our Constitutional Monarchy is not compatible and cannot give the monarch the margin to be dictator. He follows the rules of the function, all dictated in serving God and the Subjects. 

    Dictatorship was born from the desire of the individual to set order in the society by ending the others partisan militancy for having their ideas being applied in the country regardless if they are good or evil. When the same leader by attempting to end this harmful dissension ends by being what he believes fighting being a dictator who only wants his desire and will being applied, by lack of divine check of his power.

                                                                                 Nelson Mandela and Prince Philip in 2000.

 

   As third personality of the first Family, he has lot of power, all sacred. Because, the Queen or the monarch reigns or rule, call it as you want but she is supplying in her role by the members of her family who supplies her power by showing replacing her in function of the seniority right. It shows that all the different members of the Royal Family have symbolic and practical power. For example, all of them do public engagements which is a large part of their job of supplying and helping the monarch reigns. By no way then did the members of the Royal Family haven’t any power. 

I BUILT MY SITE FOR FREE USING