In the event of my kidnapping, the council restlessly reedited all the different aspects of Queen, Elizabeth II's life. All the different important events of her life, was reedited and filmed to to change her appearance in them. I am talking about her weeding with Prince Philip, yes. Do you talk about her coronation, indeed? Endless tours all around the world, to cover up Prince Charles, existance replaced by that of Prince of Wale, have been staged and recorded in holywood style to cover up both her appearance and Prince Charles deportation tour.
To give you a clear idea, before already I was born as soon as my birth was decided around 1975. The patriots and the council decided then that Queen, Elizabeth II would be pergnant and had her first and only son, after spending 55 childess. Both parties agreed that the son, the Prince to born would succeed her mother as he has the absolute right, Queen Elizabeth II. All accepted that she would born from Queen, Elizabeth II, and King George VI. A child of a never seen, noble and totally Royal blood, being born from two monarchs, any child would be nobler and pure than that.
Nevetheless, the council though officially accepted, down was playing not to apply the agreement and the law. Because, from the moment the Prince is born from the Queen, wholy womb and is the only one son of the Queen, he is the only one to have right to the throne. Moreover, he was born in the Queen, weeding household as Charles Philip Arthur George, meaning clearly he is son of Prince Philip and King George VI. Any child, any Prince can be noble, and having absolute right being born from excluse Royal blood.
Then, in acting not to apply the agreement and the law, before he was born a group of mercenaries were enroled and trained to kidnap him. When, he was born his mother dressed and made up to look like her, in 1940s when his brother, Prince of Wales was born, the same with whom the council wants to replace him after kidnapping him as they were planning it.
During his kidnapping and deportation that lasted 5 month, his mother toured the world, dressed and made up always in 1940s perspective to hide her deportation trip and prepare his replacement. They did all that and recorded it, and when they decided to move to his replacement by his brother in 1997, after kidnapping him in 1983, the council got out those recording. It edited and placing voices and color in 1940s, 1950s etc and published them everywhere it can.
The above video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=94n8MRuBuPs is one of those endless videos that the coucil and British Path News released and advertised to popularise a crime of the extremest nature, the kidnapping, hostage keeping and the usurpation of the identity of the heir to the throne. Such advertisement is no more no less than that of advertisement of the hostage keeping of a part of our country, hostage of the council through its rightful Prince. It all comes as someone kills your son, and then this person edited songs and movies to broadcast everywhere you can see it, how he has killed your son with the only one hope of keeping you sad, in fear and anger of him, in order to recall you that he is always more powerful than you. He kills your son and you can do nothing against him, you better fear and accepted him as more powerful than you and he is above justice. We are an old nation, with old subjcts, the striking majority of our subjects have above 40 than they know quite well the heir to the throne Prince Charles before, he was kidnapped. They felt as continiously and endlessly humiliated by the council planed campaign of moral breaking by bombing them with a crime done and maintained against their future King, and against them consequently.
That shameful crime is hurting and traumatising as it uses our Kingdom institutions and agencies as British Pathe which should be the guardians of the respect of laws, and the actor of the liberation of our subjects as a well known and respectable agency defending our country interests . But those agencies become the active agents of our British subjects keeping in hostage. Nothing is more traumatising than seeing a British fund media, fund by taxpayers money BBC use advertising a high treason against our country, the kidnapping, hostage keeping and identity usurpation of the heir to the throne in order to perform a coup. It aims to show to the British they are hostage of the council, that is all, there is nothing they can do, better always keeping that in their mind.
We are the proudest nation, ever created by God, reason why we have never been invaded. There is something in us that is against cowardness, and that calls for courage and sacrifice in defending our crown, and our values. That is the reason why we have never been defeated. How can we kneel to someone else, when we only kneel to God, and God onlyby kneeling only to His Deputy on earth being our monarch. BCST has the deepest confidence in our people standing up and fightng to free itself and our Kingdom by having respected our laws, especially that of the Constitutional laws and Acts regarding the succession to the throne that wants Prince Charles and only him, our next King, that we already recognised him as every British, eager of freedom, justice and love should do.
In the above videos you have noticed clearly that all different tours and events reported to be the Queen, Elizabeth II around 1963 are not her in that time, but her around and above 1983 date which Prince Charles was kidnapped and keeping hostage.
For example the Queen did not visit Ghana around 1960, but jast after deporting her son, heir to throne Prince Charles, in Diffa Niger on September 30 , 1983 from LA.
