The Crown 1 Episode 1

March 21, 2018.

The seriesThe Crown and its episode started historically in the year 1947 year of the weeding of Princess Elizabeth and Prince Philip. It started also the same moment after the council arrived to pupate the Indians to get their independence to put a public pressure on King George VI who as supreme leader is accused of being responsible of the lost of India that initiated the process of his abduction for his daughter to be Queen. An abduction or a consensus passation of power that is hidden in the death of the King, of lung problem. Whereas of course King George VI is not dead, he lived up to May 12, 1996 and keeps the essential of his power until his death, with which he handed his power to his loyals. So it is quite logical that the council series started on this important year, which marks the beginning of time for them. As the year the principle of Princess Elizabeth that they control has been accepted as the next Queen to succeed King George VI.

The series made deliberatelyan abstraction of the King not dead with the idea of setting through propaganda the false history of the King dead. Our Subjects have right to truth, our monarchythe political stability and economic development it created in our Kingdom would not be possible, if it was not based on solid virtueand values and their respecting pillars. Monarchy rules with true and values, when democracy rules with lying and illusionary philosophical principles, everything that make its weakness. Democracy is a failure in this 21th Century of human'sintellectualenlightenmentwith revolutionary inventions and discoveries that equip people with high intellect to create their own lies and live with them at the very risk of the peril it opens the door for the future, that appears dark and chaotic.

Only the last century in the confusion of the German newly born democracy didn't Hitler rise through democratic system, exploited the same weakness of democracy as the reign of lying and divisive philosophical principle of the Arian race being superior to all, with premises of of considering certain race as inferior and deserving to be destroyed.He was elected with such bad and false philosophic bases, and the entire world has seen the end of such democratic philosophy leads to: which is chaos, being the world war II. Should Germany remain a monarchy such divisive and unsound fatal rhetoricwill never emerge. Though do not got us, wrong in German monarchicalsystem, the monarch is not the head of the believer and God Deputy on earth. But, still it prevented such chaos. Never in mankind history chaos and great disorder among nation in dimension of world war emerged or is initiated by monarchy as the source of the conflict. O there are lot of hidden secret behind world war I, as created by the killing of the Austrian Prince. O wasn't it true that the first greatest continental conflict from which the two world wars take their source of inspiration born from the unlimited Republican ambition of Napoleon Bonapartedreaming conquering and controlling Europe and through it the entire world. Peace to the world goes with a monarchy, ours, rising to save the Europe and the entire world.

We do not condemn democracy as system of governance which did its proof back to the Greek epoch but even then it was balanced and control by monarchy, combined with religions and its values and principle. The basis of Socrates, or Plato's' democratic thought is inspired by their love and respect of the Greek divinities. Democracy as relying on the reason satisfying itself with even lies alone did not create the conditions of a stable anddevelopedsocio cultural Athenians society that made successful the first example of democracy. From that example democracy, when detached from the monarchicaland religious values context is unsound and is the perfect receipt for chaos for a country, and from there to the entire world.

The series and the episode started with a scene intended to show the fragility of the King, who was shown coughing blood and apparently very ill. Then he entered in a room to appoint Prince Philip as Duke of Edinburgh.To make the cover up of the scene showing the King sick, he was shown dressing by his maids in a very imperial way. And in another scene he was made said that he did not want his Subjects to see him weak, a monarch should be strong and it is not allowed to every one to be King. The problem is with the arrogant manner in which he said it. Whereas my father, King George VI is not attached to the imperial side of his sacred function, he was someone modest in carrying on his duty. The all scenes give an impression of a very choleric, and insecure King. When King George VI acted and lived his status of King with modesty, as he even hates being monarch and wants be a normal person, though taking seriously his responsibility.He is by no way arrogant in carrying out its duty.

In the episode 1, though before Charles was shown, he has not beenreferredby his name. Meaning, Netflix and the council accepted that Charles to which they set meaning possibly Prince of Wales was born before the wedding of Queen Elizabeth II. For example in the episode he attended the wedding though never named. That means also through the Charles, they refer also to Prince Charles, the real one though the perspective is put clear through the event references, the year of the actions on Prince of Wales. Moreover, in terms of facial resembling Charles was chosen clearly as he is under his own skin, a kid with a flat face and long and well cared blond hair. To sum up, all consideration taken the series and the council mean by Charles they mean the real one in 50% and as Prince of Wales in the remaining percentage. The entire world, and the British know clearly how look the real Charles different of Prince of Wales in terms of facial shape and hair style, they understand clearly that the Charles means the real one put in perspective of Prince of Wales with his ownappearancenot that of Prince of Wales as the council does usually.That clearly balanced the series clearly through the time and event references in Prince of Wales perspective. The Crown is a political series showing clearly how though it knows and take in account the fact that the world and the British knows that Prince Charles is not Prince of Wales, it wants to replace him by an usurper that it wants to make a King, here is why we talk about the council illusionary coup in its logic of imposing Prince of Wales as the next King, by relying on its mediatic power imposing through its channel Prince of Wales as Prince Charles; and acting as does not care about the other medias demanding the release of the real Prince Charles and his having his right to the throne. The Crown is an insult to truth and justice.

Of course, the kid puts to mean Charles, was called as so after in kind of quick and mirroring scene that follows a 12 month latter scenes, Princess Elizabeth shows pregnant, having quickly and successively Charles and Anne, with whom she was shown in a boat in Malta with Prince Philip. That shows clearly interests is shown to Prince of Wales being born from Princess Elizabeth, but it was not shown and referredproperly.

In that same episode at the wedding to Princess Elizabeth Eden said to one of his colleagues that Churchill thinks that he is 'the father of nation'. The statement has all its meaning as intending to structure the all indirect references showing the King lacking any executive power, and the Prime Minister, the real leader of the nation. In fact Great Britain is not a nation but a Kingdom, it is very misleading thanreferringto our Kingdomas a nation.

All that is well structured because in the following scenes the King that was said sick, just woke up from his bed after a surgery of the lung when Churchillwas shown in spotlight in public making a leading political speech. All that participated in the attempt of showing the Prime Minister being the real leader, and the King lacking any real power.

In this first episode of the series nothing is an insult to the monarchy, and the symbol and the image of the King than the scene of his surgery. How can a monarch shows cut as piece of meat, by physician in a claiming respected series as The Crown. Normally in respectable movie, except horror movie, the operation of a person is not shown in its cutting and lacerating details. Whereas here the physicians were shown as torturing the body of the King, with scissor, with a remarkable coldness. This is a forced attempt to destroy the sacredness of the Kind in his symbol and physical body. One must not forget that the King is the Head of the Church normally in any reference to him this factor should be taken in account even in its artistic creation. Even in movies or series talking about medicine or surgery the proper operation of persons are not shown because for a non professional circle, they are very shocking and upsetting scenes, not to be shown. If of course the goal was not to shock as it is the case with the series. King George VI and through him United Kingdom have been humiliated, insulted and bullied in their own sacred flesh, shows cutting without any respect an honour to the person and what he represents. All that participate in the council effort to bully and destroy our monarchy and its values for transforming our Kingdom as a Republic.

In another scene King George VI was shown receiving and accepting MrChurchillas Prime Minister. O the real expression was ' I invite you to form a new government'. Indeed it was the head of the majority that is invited by the monarch to form a new government. Nevertheless, in the series they act as it is just a protocol, a convention. In fact before inviting the head of the majority the King under preposition of the winning Party of the election discussed with the person during many meetings and days to see if he fits the position as the King thinks. And even the designation during the meeting comes after long hours of final exchanges. Because, the King has the power and even the duty not to confirm the head of the majority as Prime Minister though the Party proposes it, he can ask it to propose a new person. Or even goes imperial by calling a new election, or designating another person in the majority Party. With the series the sacred official service was filmed as it is just aformalityand a joke performedby the King while standing and in the first seconds of his reception of the designated candidate. This intends once again to show the King as not having power if not just honorific and protocolary power.

When Churchill is depicted in leading skin in the spotlight, the King was shown in the same episode with Subjects singing to him and give him a token crown in paper. Follows a very shocking scene of the King crying, of the idea of being sick seriously and dying imminently. But the realobjectiveof this part of the series is to portray the King as the shadow leader, with shadow power because the crown by itself is not true. Showing the King crying at the prospect of dying in front of his Subjects is neither a falteringportrayal, for a figure that should be above such feeling. It is to be not forgotten that the King as a religious leader, should not fear death, heaven is death in the symbolic. Nothing bad for the stability of the realm than a crying monarch in front of its own Subjects, when he had the sacred responsibility in very circumstances to be calm andundramatized.To lead means between death and pain of unseen size to be calm and show courage. Nothing terrible than an insecure Subjects it creates the perfect climate for chaos, they cannot work and neither consume, things that are very bad the economy. Of far the worst thing is in fear they kill each other, in their neighbourg and relatives they see enemy. A climate of suspicionis very bad in a Kingdom. The monarch has the duty of calm. We evoke, courage in monarchical context more than even in Republican context where the leader is apprehended as a leading individual with natural right to be as every human being with right to moment of weakness, the leader cannot lead successfully when he inspired fragility, insecurity to his people. When, the people intend their leaders to inspire them confidence and source of security that goes with keeping a climate of peace good for every attribute of the social coexistence.In monarchical context once again the monarch should embody courage. Monarchy goes with nobility of the King, a concepts that is supported by the reality of courage.

We close this analysis with another destructive scene for our Royal Institution with the King entering Prince Philip chamber, and waking him from his sleep naked as a worm. Such scene is simply unacceptablehow can in a virtuousUnited Kingdom, where the monarch is supposed to be the guardian of virtues, show rising his in law naked, and acting as it is a banal and normal deed. Such thing should never happen, the monarch avoids seeing not only his law naked, but any Subject sacred in its sanctityas God creation. Even in Republican context, never can you see in a movie the President or a leader seeing his in law naked. And how can even the husband of the Queen being shown naked, it is simply as it is the Queen that is shown naked. Worst it gives an image of corrupted Royal Family, we will not longer go further in the interpretation of how bad such radical scenes are, we all know it, and every one can structure it. The council has crossed every single limit either of decency, moral and religion in its forced attempt of carrying out its illusionary coup; and remarkable is our Subjects until now degree of tolerances of such radicalism and high treasons. Patient till the appropriate moment has always been our strength, with it we conquer the world, has never been defeated and saved the world, we, no one else defeated, Hitler. We did it as nothing, and it is with this same virtue and value of patient, courage and perfect social organisation through our monarchy that we have done it.

The Crown 1 Episode 1

Read More Article on The Crown