The Queen was report authorised the wedding Harry Charles and Meghan Markle

March 30, 2018.

Last days the Queen is reported authorising the wedding of Harry Charles illegally called Prince Harry and Meghan Markle. It was not the Queen that authorised it, as she was dead as we reported it on November 12, 2018. Queen Elizabeth II's position regarding this wedding is clear, she was against it, and decided then even not attending it. She gave the reason of not attending the wedding, ' She thinks that Markle was not the good match for Harry among many due to the fact that she was a divorcée.' That was the position of the real and only one Queen Elizabeth II that was dead, and replaced illegally and criminally by Prince Andrew who carried plastic mask to play her role. Whereas, immediately when the monarch is dead his heir to the throne became de facto King, as Prince Charles is currently the de facto King as King George VI. Prince Andrew does not have the smallest right to the throne, and is simply a pupate in the hand of the council.

We do not presume that if the Queen was alive she would not authorise the wedding. Just she might likely not endorsed it publicly, though down she was for it. For example during the wedding of Prince of Wales and Camillia Bowles in 2005, she did not attended their wedding though participated to the party. In fact Queen Elizabeth supported her son in his fight of getting of his absolute right, but by fear of the council and under the influence of her own aids, she slided toward the council that is how she attended the Cenotaph of Remembrance. But, attending the ceremony though it was almost an indirect handing of power to Prince of Wales is totally different of giving her agreement to the wedding. Would she be alive, we bet that she would not authorise this wedding for two main reason 1) the wedding of a divorcée is forbidden by our Anglican Church and booth brides are not totally British at all, 2) she supported laws and her son absolute right to the succession.

Regarding the 1) the council politicizing the Church for having in 2002, it authorities divorce does not mean our Subjects vision has changed regarding divorce, this is not a matter of change. Moreover, the archbishops were appointed by the monarch, and Queen Elizabeth II was under the influence of the council, which was the one that appointed them. Then politically it would be very damaging for her to give her assent to the wedding beside the point that it leads to the initial step of the council planed coup that it does not have the mean to do. Authorising the wedding would be very dangerous to Queen Elizabeth II, would she be alive, reason why she would not give her assent Those who did that at her behalf have betrayed her.

We think Queen Elizabeth II was betrayed by her loyals in giving her assent by her behalf, though as dead it is to the new King, King George VII to pronounce himself regarding the wedding and declared officially being against it.

Wrote by BCST