King George VI.
September 10, 2018.
Hold on! Queen Elizabeth II pupating our public media BBC to broadcast the cover up of the sacrilege, killing Prince Charles. In that logic BBC, the shame of our Kingdom in its current form as broadcasting plot to kill the Prince Heir to the throne and covering it up. Fails in its mission as broadcasting the putting in chaos and destruction of our Kingdom.
The media is broadcasted indirect but clear articles for every one who knows the about, being killing of the Prince Heir to the throne, Prince Charles. Yesterday the media published an article titled My baby died. Please ask me his name : ( https://https-www-bbc-co-uk.0.freebasics.com/news/stories-45398894?iorg_service_id_internal=856767661081871%3BAfp3s6e0AkeyvBVH ).
It is to add that Prince Charles is no more a baby, even when he was jailed he was a child age 3, and currently aged 37. And if she considers her only son as her son, she will not ask to be asked his name. How can one forget the name of his son? That proves as we always said it that Queen Elizabeth II is married to her throne, and has only one son: her throne that one The Sun her media tell it to everyone that wanted to hear as for example after May 19, tragedy. And if she really loves her son and her Kingdom, she will not personally put him in jail, imprison him with the enemies of the Kingdom, and in degrading conditions for the Prince Heir to the throne. Knowing that the Kingdom would be humiliated and blackmailed through him. You understand certainly the article, meaning when the sacrilege will be done, the killing of Prince Charles will be done, she will claim that he was not son, he is named by the false and criminal name that they they attempt to make his. And 90% of British and at least 70% people of world were alive and aware when his imprisonment started in 1983.
Indeed Prince Charles is Queen Elizabeth II's son, but is not her son from the moment he was delivered, he is the Heir to the British Throne, he does not belong, represent, and serve a person, but he belongs to the Kingdom that is why he is called officially Prince Charles not Charles Elizabeth II, that is why he is called Prince of Edinburgh, that is why he is called Prince Heir to the throne. You see well the title and position of Prince Charles is so huge at an extent that it is linked to the Kingdom and nowhere in his name his parents, or his mother name appears. In fact he does not have parent if not the Kingdom, he represents and serves. That is the meaning of Prince Charles, Heir to the British Throne. Should the impossible happen him dying jail (sacrilege) or even after his release his body or funeral is not in the hands of a person, no, but in the hands of the Kingdom through its Institutions being the Royal Institution and the British Government. Then nowhere did the name of a mother or parent appear but only the Kingdom through its Institutions. So, Queen Elizabeth II has nothing to say regarding the life or death of her son, this is a duty of the Kingdom, especially the British Government.
If you understand well this article it intends to say to her accomplices, and the enemies of the Kingdom, and the world kill him he is my son, I will not recognize him as my son and we will cover up his killing. That is the meaning of My baby died. Please ask me his name. And you know the official positions of all the British Governments that succeeds his imprisonment, governments on which she has power.Still the monarchists and King George VI's other loyals have influence on them. But the one that has the greatest power on her is her Party, the Tory Party. The other political Parties have lot of say in matter regarding the Prince Heir to the Throne. The other parts of the Kingdom as Scotland, Wales, and Northern Island and the Republic of Ireland at least through Northern Ireland has lot to say also. It was the same repartition of power on the other Political Parties as Labour Party which had lot of Prime Ministers having the same position, Prince of Wales is Prince of Wales only, and Prince Charles is the Heir to the throne through the clear insinuation and whenever the matter will be put they will have the same position. Otherwise every rational person will tell you, if Queen Elizabeth II will have the political Parties recognized Prince of Wales of even his living as Prince Charles, Heir to the Throne. She will not try to kill Prince Charles there are 35 years in row. She will have them declaring recognizing Prince of Wales as Prince Charles, the Heir to the Throne, and let Prince Charles alone as he does not matter .
And it is an equation, Prince of Wales being not Prince Charles, Heir to the throne, the others even of their living and his sons do not matter, and they are not even his sons. Prince Henry, or clearly Henry Charles as that is his real name is not even British, but he is only American from his parents, his father is even African American. Whereas William Bingo illegally calls Prince William is not son of Prince of Wales, but the son of Princess Diana who is not even a Princess of her own as his father John Jason was an unreported son of Kingdom George VI. Then Iren John real name is Princess of Wales. Thus William Bingo is not even members of the Royal Family to be called by the title Prince. His father is Francois Bingo, the 1980 driver of Iren John.
King George VI, Prince Charles grand father.
But those same Governments serves the Kingdom and its Subjects and Monarch, not the person of Monarch but its symbol,what she should represent as a voice of wisdom, a saint figure as Head of the church that should not do so huge crime as exploited 35 years back the youth of her son, who once again is not her son as Prince, especially,Heir to the throne. As so he does not age, he is not a Mister to be seen under his age. But the Prince, he is a symbol, a religious figure, the second in the Kingdom as Heir to the Throne. The positions of all British Governments is clear; once again there is only one Prince Charles, Heir to the British Throne, the other of even his living: Prince of Wales is refered as only Prince of Wales but never Prince Heir to the throne that he is not, he is considered and as he should be a Prince as any.
And evidently if he exploited his youth to jail him; it is only because as Prince, Heir to the Throne, he not her son though born from her; bur the son of the Kingdom if you forced yourself to find him parents, when as second God Deputy on earth, and even currently as the de facto God Deputy on earth, it is a sin than those give him parents because God does not have parents. And exactly as God Deputy on earth, he should not have and consider in term of biological relation, but sacred one all link to God. In other words the Prince Heir to the Throne does not have on all grounds parents, he is a symbol and a saint figure. He is only those two. That is why exactly she exploited his youth to jail him.
In today's article of the same BBC that more than ever betrayed his function. The media today published: https://https-www-bbc-co-uk.0.freebasics.com/news/stories-45451078?iorg_service_id_internal=856767661081871%3BAfp3s6e0AkeyvBVH.
The article is entitled : The night I met a troll in Stocklom. In other words I am married to the mercenary that is jailing him. Hold on! how does it sound, to hear that Queen Elizabeth II of UK, is married to an African mercenary, a rapper of a woman (as he raps consistently Fati) and the torturer of the British Heir to the British Throne? Indeed he is doing all this daily, consistently and under the eyes of the entire world. And even the so called marriage even in an hypothesis never happened, it was all done in very limited options 35 years back as it was only done in thinking to attenuate what cannot be attenuated as supreme crime against, the British, the world, God, killing the Heir to the Throne. No worst thing than thinking that. Their optional wedding was only for the sake of thinking attenuating the devastative news of her having relation with such man and she did the sacrilege. Each of it is very lethal especially the last one, as Prince Heir to the Throne. And do not please think that Prince is jailing in kind of parallel remote family. Totally and definitely, no. For example it was thrice that Queen Elizabeth II sees Oscar Wilde and all times times before she let him jailed on October 05, 1983 Prince Charles. A baby was conceived through surrogacy in the same effort of thinking attenuating the impact of the sacrilege on him. He is currently in Denmark that is how emerged the title of the article. All her phone exchange with Oscar is all about the imprisonment of Prince Charles and how to torture him or cover up his killing. But Prince Charles is not even jailing by Queen Elizabeth II. A person but by countries America, France, Russia and Niger. They are the ones who really jail Prince Charles, they are the ones that controls Oscar and all the other mercenaries mercenaries through their Embassies. For example Oscar is even a CIA and MI5 agents, he was even a former marine that attended Golf War in 1999. Those countries built tours around the jail to secure the jailing. Worst Prince Charles is jailing such way any political prisoner and prisoner can be. Even jailed any of his right as political prisoner is respected. He is consistently tortured and humiliated not only by Oscar under the injection of Queen Elizabeth II, but also by the other mercenaries control by foreign mercenaries who torture, torture humiliate, contaminate, and intoxicate him , and trying to kill him for blackmailing UK or for taking revenge on it. Prince Charles is also jailed mutilated with the very harmful bismuth with which even a Guantanamo terrorist prisoners were not tortured and mutilated. And imagine for a Prince Heir of UK, one of greatest Kingdom on earth, if not the greatest power in earth by joining the empire to it; he is jailing in horrible conditions in the latest country on earth: Niger, and even in Niamey, Niger he is jailed in the most poorest area Aeroport a suburb country side of the city. The house in which he is jailed is surrounded by rubbishes. He is jailed not only deeply malnourished, but deeply contaminated and intoxicated with the very harmful bismuth. And daily Queen Elizabeth II and her accomplices plot to poison and intoxicate him for killing him (sacrilege). Every time he eats the food of the jail he felt sick. Worst he is jailing without humanitarian work to attenuate his imprisonment, Queen Elizabeth II and her accomplices block him having a job. At the end of each month Oscar Wilde is paid by Queen Elizabeth II through Jenna Bush who is the primary control on him, Queen Elizabeth is just the secondary control. He is paid with the astronomical sum of $18,000 just for jailing Prince Charles. Of course as any guard he spends any single coin of his salary in the jail he sends the essential of the money for his relatives in Guine Konakri his country or to his relatives in Niamey, his brother Daryl is in Niger to take his money and. He sent also money to his relatives in USA.
Even this morning Prince Charles has been of a chemical attack, indeed we much not hide the right spelling of things. Bismuth is a very lethal chemical weapon. After I was attacked many times by this chemical weapon by Queen Elizabeth II's mercenaries and her accomplices on my way to IRSH, few minutes after my arrival I had a serious courbature, fever, headache, and stomache. I vomitted horribly. It was only after taking paracetamol and sleeping during almost 3 hours in IRSH that I felt fine and resuming working to write this article. This is a serious violation of human rights, how can a human being, a political prisoner being gassed with such lethal chemical weapon under the eyes of entire world. This is defiance to humanity, to right and justice. And it must be stop. It is the duty of international organisation as UN to condemn such unprecedented of human rights when it is time, that if it did not stop will clearly lead to a World War III. Regarding the reason of such serious human violation which is doing the sacrilege (kill Prince Charles) for doing an impossible coup in UK that will lead the world to a planetary war, inevitably. More than ten times the horrible imprisonment of Prince Charles risks sinking the world in a World War II to talk about the Able Acher conflit for example or the Novewegian missle launching toward Moscou. Of course, the UN does not have access to the imprisonment circle of Prince Charles but it has the total power to condemn it publicly, and calling UN Council Meeting to vote a resolution to demand the imediate release of Prince Charles.