King George VI over Years
March 19, 018.
King George VI in 1930s.
1..] a) General Context of the study
By the same way that the council understands that he has to put in Prince of Walesperspective my mother, Queen Elizabeth II, Prince Philip; it has to put my father in this perspective as well. If they want to make realistic the lying that Prince of Wales is born on November 13, 1948; they have to show my father, King George VI at the christening ceremony. Nevertheless, with which physical appearancedid my father’s double has to appear? That was the challenging questions they had to answer. Though my father was alive then, he was totally against this campaign of reediting my mother's and in general all our family members livesfor depriving his son of his right to the throne.
Thus, they used many profiles of my father, with different possibilities regarding his appearance.They employed doubles of him such way they will be ground of claiming that it was his brothers or father in their hidden editing of my mother’s life, deep in their Palace that they released after they did my replacement in 1997, and the death of my father otherwise he would not accept it.
My father, King George VI was dead on May 12, 1997, though reported falsely dead in 1952. We have endless irrefutable proofs of him living through years until his death. It is barely sometimes, he changes his name to make some public apparitions like at the wedding of Princess Anne, in which he was reported in the video of Princess Anne Romance as Lord Mountbatten by the council which edited it. Whereas, he just attended the ceremony without any change in his physical appearance. He was just as he was naturally. He attended also the Prince of Wales weeding on July 29, 1981, few months before my birth, we have pictures of him at that event just as to the other events, and we posted all those pictures in this post either directly or in the comment boxes.
A screen shot of my father; King Gerge VI at Prince of Wales wedding with Diana on July 29, 1981. He had a khaki coat close to his wife. And all around him are his procession.
King George VI in middle at the wedding of Princess Anne. He dressed and show just as he was known before falsely declared dead.
My father and his wife in 1980s.
My father and his wife in the 1990s, I am in board on the table, the first in the picture from left to right.
The double with his specific corporal form will never have the exact shape as my father, neither his exact face. The council has not only shown my father, at my christening in the perspective of Prince of Wales, but also at the other important events of my mother’s life. Here are all the reasons for which it is important to fight this campaign of intoxication through studies as this one, showing the progress of my father body through time, and the difference between my father and his double. That study is important also because in the process of the campaign of re-writing my mother’s history, the council hid visual elements as pictures and videos, and audio elements of my father, wherever it could. It is very rare to find true pictures and videos of my father, if not on patriots’ Medias as Daily Express . Imagine, even his Wikepedia page has been published with false picture of him. Re-Written the history of a country leaders, is destroying the national identity of that country, and destroying its economy and culture. The current study will bring you true pictures of my father throughout his life, so that you will be able to make the distinction between the true and false pictures and videos of him and fight their re-written of our country history for the purpose of the coup they were preparing. That is the goal of this important study.
b..] Short overview of King George VI’s life after his false reported death
My father announced falsely dead in 1952 after the council’s palace coup, in complicity with his wife, Elizabeth Bowes Lyon and some of his children as Elizabeth II, Princess Margaret. In fact it is not a coup but a mere abduction with the public pressure put on him after India was pupated being independent. It was his abduction that was covered up by his death. He divorced Elizabeth Bowes Lyon, married and found a new family.
King George VI lives his life normally after this coup, without carrying any mask in England. He attended the most important public ceremonies of the family. I have proof of him attended the weeding of Prince of Wales with his wife. My father attended naturally my christening in Buckingham Palace, music room on December 15, 1981. Before my kidnapping April 14, 1983 he played more than well his role of father; he loves his son more than everything. King George VI never hesitated to express his determination and will to see his son succeeding Queen Elizabeth II, as he has the absolute right. I have a picture of him with my brothers, few months years old in 1981.
After his abduction, he keeps a good part of his power, in the different apparatus of our country, and on some of our dominions as New Zealand. In addition he attended G7 Summits as represented of his share of the throne that is clearly the more powerful; though Queen Elizabeth II is declared as the formal Queen.
King George VI first right in Virginia on May 29, 1983 at G7 Summit, with world leaders.
In the documentary on my grandmother titled The Queen Mother, he was interviewed. He talked about the pain, he felt after the kidnapping of his son. He also condemned the torture Prince Charles was victim then, and expressed vigorously his same will and determination to see his son succeeded, Queen Elizabeth. In the documentary, he was not only once interviewed, but over years till his death. King George VI was dead on May 12, 1996.
2..)Physical changes of King George VI during his life
King Gerge VI kid
King George VI adolescent.
King George VI kid.
King George VI adolescent.
King George VI adult in 1920s.
My father’s body has gone many changes over the years, the natural oldering process. Both his body and face have gone those changes, with which before even coming to the comparison between him and his double, you will see the stunning differences.
a..] The face
King George VI’s face underwent the same changes as that of his sons and daughters, which is normal due to the common genetic familial. The main change regarding his face was the fact that with time his face becomes high-pitched with age; when young, he had a flat face. His nose which was opened and flat becomes longer and high pitched as well, adding prominence to the high pitchness of his face.
King George VI’s front became also high pitched and expanded in function of his body fatness that we will see as well. The ears became bigger and open in proportion of the stretching of his face.
My father’s eyes with age saw some changes, for example it got close with years. Of course the expansion of the front and the cheeks became big and played a role in that process.
The space between his nose and lip became also longer and high pitched in the same proportion with the face. But the part of his face that has undergone a major change was his double chin that became high short, as the face became high pitched giving prominence to the pointed aspect of the face.
It was clearly in his late 40 and 50 that his face got the maximum of its own flatness, and it became longer in proportion of the face fatness and the thinness of his body. It was especially that profile of him the council has used as model for his double. At that age my father’s top of the head was fat as well in proportion of his face and body; when old it becomes stretched. In the late 40s his face kept its same longness, but deeper back than when he was young. Gradually the hairs though keeping its longness became blond, till becoming totally blond. At the corner of his face close to the ears, especially the right ear, his hairs were more black at all times, even old and blond-hairs, those corners kept their differential blackness. With age my father’s cheeks became high pitched, when they were flat young.
b..] The body
Along with his face, my father’s body undergoes the same mutations as his face; the face and the body are in harmony: the face is the capital of the body. As King George VI’s face becomes fat and high pitched, so did the body. Over years my father becomes fatter, in the same proportion of his corporal state in his 50s; he got simply fatter and the natural procession made him a little stocky just as my mother. Here a similar comparison can be made between my mother and father. They do have the same natural mutations over years, they all get fatter, almost stocky (the weight of the age), and their faces become high pitched. Prince Philip saw the same mutation but he got less fat and stocky than my father and mother, that is mainly due to his military training rigour that made him thin and unable to get very fatter, and his height play a huge impact in that process as well. Prince Charles is between his two parents in terms of facial appearance and height, I have both features; and from this point I was totally different of Prince of Wales who looks more as Prince Philip in his tallness.
Regarding the height my father is a little taller than my mother, and little taller than my grandmother; but he was shorter than Prince Philip and even a little shorter than Prince of Wales.
In 1980s my father got a little short, and of course with age this shortness gets stressed.
3..] Comparison between King George VI and his double
With the editing of my christening did in the perspective of Prince of Wales, all the options were laid on the table by the council; they put elements to mean it is my christening at smallest percentage by putting a double that could be declared as my father at 50%, though at 70% you can say it is my grandfather, George V on the other side. The video was shot to mean more it is the christening of Prince of Wales because they put doubles that could be declared as my father during Prince of Wales’ real christening with the double of my father in 1937 ( it could mean him in 1942); and even a double of my father in 1948 profiles. Those doubles of my father could be considered as my father’s brothers Prince John, Prince George, Prince Henry and his sister; Princess Mary’s double was put also. I have a precious picture proving if needed that the video of my christening is a false editing in 1981. The picture being in real colour ( it means logically there video was filmed in colour originally and blacken latter) shows clearly that the video was edited in 1980s and could not be shot in 1948 where colour picture technology is not invented. It is developed decades later.
But, clearly they have given lot of reasons to think that they consider my father’s profile in 1937 to be that of him, especially through the way he was laughing and gesturing showing his happiness to have a grandson (in the perspective of Prince of Wales son of my mother), and later they released many pictures and videos of my father’s double playing with me either age 2 in Buckingham Palace, or with my mother, and the other family members.
In fact globally at 80 % they took my father’s profile in 1937 to replace it by a double to mean him in 1948, talking always about my christening picture. In one word through there the other profiles of my father from that of 1948 to that of 1981 (the profile of my father in 1981 is only him at 40% for the other remaining 60% he remains as my grandfather, King George V); the council picked up a profile of my father of 1937 deliberately, knowing he does have this profile that year. With the option of that it can be my father, and his sons and daughter attending the christening of his great grandson, Prince of Wales, and it does not exclude attending the christening of his grandson, because there was my father in a profile close to that of 1942 his birth year, and my grandmother is in the video also. In fact the council has deliberately chose a false profile of my father by letting many other profiles as that of father in 1981 in a kind of gesture of conciliation regarding the patriots. Though the editing video by choosing a false profile of my father, shows clearly they do not have any respect for the truth, for laws; they are in logic of military force not of right.
A picture of staged christening in Prince of Wales perspectie. From left to right Prince Philip, the second is put to represent through man that carried a plastic mask my father as he was in 1930s when the third man means also him in 1940s, the last man is King Gerge V, and the woman is Princess Mary. Note well that my grandfather King George V is dead in 1948 the false year of Prince of Wales Christening.
Princess Elizabeth first from left to right; Princess Margaret and King George VI in 1930s.
King George VI in 1920s
The Quee Mother, Queen Mary and King George VI. In the second row Priness Elizabeth and Margaret in early 1930s.
We have commented this picture many times, the second picture, King George VI the first man in black coat from left to right. Here is how he looked exactly in 1947 at the wedding of Queen Elizabeth II, then one year latter he still looked almost like this. I will mention Prince of Wales is the second kid in the second row.
King George VI and Queen Elizabeth in the late 1920.
King George VI and Queen Elizabeth in the late 1920.
After, this false christening they edited many other videos, of the same double of my father in 1937 profile behaving toward me as father. I recalled him hang in out with me kindly as a father. I have lot of pictures to prove that. There is a picture of him close to me when I was playing in Buckingham Palace. In another picture, I was sitting close to him in a sofa, along with my grandmother, and Zara Tindall. You can see him in another picture with the remaining members of my family.
In the picture of my father at Elizabeth II’s wedding it appears clearly that he became fatter over the years between 1937 and 1948 with the10 years natural growth process, and that process of fatness continues as in 1981 he became almost twice much fatter. Before any comparison, those two serious mistakes of the council regarding the relevant profile of my father that is to be exploited to give to their double, and the fact that already in 1947 Prince of Wales was aged 5 years old is to be noted. Those huge mistakes make that at any comparison between my father and his double is impossible, if not to remark that they have not chosen the appropriate profile of him. Of course they count on our Subjects lack of information on the 1940s to hide their serious mistakes because that time TVs are not well spread, and though the videos and pictures were edited in 1981, they were released in 2010s, 30 years after their editing and 70 years after the event they allegedly cover.
But, still all around Internetand on the Medias of the patriots as Daily Express you can see real videos and images of my father at those different stages of his life. Moreover, we have posted pictures of my father at all the different stages of his life from his childhood to death, along with false pictures of him, so that you see the huge differences between the propaganda and the real pictures of my father.
Since the council has put the stress on the profile of my father in 1937 as that of him in 1948, we will make the comparison of my father as he was in 1937 years of his coronation profile to my father’s double in that same year they imitated. In addition the double of my father in 1948 cannot be considered as him, because the person does not behave one who attended the christening of his son, or grandson, he looks robotic just as my grandfather was through his reaction. So a comparison between the profiles of the double imitating my father in 1948 is not necessary because the reaction of the person matters also. In fact though there is reasonable ground to think that that person is my father in 1948, clearly when you look well this person you see clearly it does not look as my father in that year. The double had a short and round head in 1948 perspective when then my father had an almost rectangular face which is already high pitched and the hairs of the two persons are totally different, King George VI does not have frizzy hair but long hair, which is increasingly blond. As result at first glance, you see he does behave as my father attending the wedding of his grandson. And all those people are doubles carrying masks. With their resting behavior, their faces with their contact with the plastic appear odd and detached of him then in 1948.
Before entering in every details though important, at first sight their double has a serious air of fakeness and superficiality due to the fact that it was a person that has the body resembling my father they have picked, which they asked to carry a plastic mask and dressed as him, the classical movie industry montage. It is quite normal that it has an air of superficiality because it was a tiny and elastic plastic but despite those characteristics, it cannot reveal the different exact movement of the face controlled by millions of nerves. Then when the face makes an expression the plastic mask cannot even display the thousandth of that movement, no matter the degree flexibility of the plastic mask. As comparison the classical commercial mask has much less degree of precision in terms of translating the facial expressions. Those sophisticated masked just ameliorated them, and still the fakeness appears and will always appear because it is quite impossible to fabricate a plastic mask that can translate all the facial expressions of a person. Those millions of nerves that guide the face cells of the skin to give a given expression cannot be translated by any mask fabricated and to be fabricated because the mask cannot be connected or tiny enough to give the appearance of someone else’s face and translated the first person facial expression. Beside even the fact that the double does not and cannot have the same facial expressions than of the real person: every single human being has his own facial expression prints different of that the others. Then, in the video you can see well when my father’s double speaks, or face’s move you see the plastic of the mask moving attempted in vain to translate the person’s expressions that was the first serious mistake.
You can also see that the double's hairs are different of my father in 1937. The double had a mask with small and relatively frizzy hairs in the white softness hairs style; when my father in 1937 as in all time has long and very soft skin. In addition my father has black hairs to grow blond hairs with time, logically quite less black as the blond nature of his hairs appeared. Comparatively to his daughters Elizabeth and Princess Margaret, King George VI’s haironly gradually developed blond, when the first two hairs at all time were blond, just as mine is. Whereas the double has a very shining black hairs. King George VI’s hairs style was badly imitated by the doubly. My father had all times, less hairs, than that of the other parts of his head independently to the hair style, that part is located precisely in the corner of his ears. That part, small hairs were always black or less blond as that is the general nature of his hairs, when the double had black hairs. Nevertheless, they have edited another video of me and mother in Buckingham Palace in the arms of the double of my father, that video named Rare Home Moves Reveals a Happy Childhood video posted by Sky.ews which has the picture from the Royal Trust Pictures, to contrast and give a little more blond hair to my father’s double than in the christening video where the double had far black hair, though it is black and white video.
The original picture of my christening in Prince of Wales perspective, my man represented my father; is the one standing. That means it is profile of my father in 1930 that is kept by the council as him in 1940s.
My father and mother as they look in early 1930s.
The double and with even his mask had also far less muscle bound cheeks than of my father’s developed. The front head of my father is quite different to that of the double as well; the latter had a short expanded front head, my father had a wide expanded front head that goes with the general form of his face, the double front head does not go with the proportion of his face. Though you cannot see clearly the eyes of their double, as they took the videos such way his eyes do not appear quite well, you can see the general aspect of the double eyes which were black when my father has kind of brown, green eyes totally different of the black eyes of the double. Moreover, at the root of the eyes of the double, you see clearly the detachment of the mask that make a small fatness that did not appear on my father’s face.
King George VI and Queen Elizabeth in late 1920s.
Winston Churchill and King George VI in 1940.
King George VII wrote this article.
